Children’s safety- a postcode lottery?

Sam Preston 1 November 2018 1 min read
Children’s safety- a postcode lottery? feature image

A report produced by the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Children (APPGC) has raised concerns that the varied thresholds across Local Authorities in supporting children at risk of harm or in need of help equates to a postcode lottery. The report findings, from a survey of 97 directors of children’s services and 1,700 social workers (DCSs), found that there were variations across Local Authorities in the thresholds for deciding when to put a protection plan in place because a child is at significant risk of harm, in the terms for care order applications and provision of early help and wider preventative services. Whilst the APPGC have stated that "Local Authorities should be empowered to set local priorities that respond to the specific needs of their populations",they believe "that a postcode lottery in children's social care is unfair to children and families and is not acceptable." Evidence submitted to the inquiry by social workers and researchers indicated that funding constraints influence decisions on whether to intervene to support children. The APPGC brings together MPs and members of the House of Lords who are committed to improving policy affecting children and young people

Sam Preston

SSS Learning Safeguarding Director


Related podcasts:

See all podcasts

Related courses:

See all courses

Related articles

Group of teachers in a classroom
Navigating the Designated Safeguarding Lead (DSL) Role

by Sam Preston
SSS Learning Safeguarding Director

scales of justice London
adults in meeting
A systemic failure to protect children

by Sam Preston
SSS Learning Safeguarding Director

Working together to safeguard children - the key changes
Working Together to Safeguard Children

by Sara Spinks
SSS Author & Former Headteacher

What is Regulated Activity in Schools?

by Sam Preston
SSS Learning Safeguarding Director